A fifth witness of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, has tendered evidence before a Federal Capital Territory, FCT, High Court in Abuja against a former Aviation Minister, Hadi Sirika.
The witness, Musa Odiniyan informed Justice S. C. Oriji that Sirika awarded contracts for the repairs of Katsina Airport by the ministry to Al Buraq Global Investment company linked to Jalal Sule Hamma, his son-in-law and not qualified for the contract.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC is prosecuting Sirika, his daughter Fatima Hadi Sirika, his son-in-law, Jalal Sule Hamma and Al Buraq Global investment on six -count amended charges bordering on contract fraud to the tune of N2,825,032,220.97 (Two Billion, Eight Hundred and Twenty Five Million, Thirty Two Thousand, Two Hundred and Twenty Naira, Ninety Seven kobo).
The witness, during a cross-examination by counsel to the fourth defendant Michael Numa, SAN, reaffirmed his position in his evidence that the company could not have qualified for the bidding process or the contract award if open and competitive bidding was done.
“We use some criteria for determining the award of contracts for companies. I still maintain that if it was an open competitive bidding, the company Al Buraq may not have qualified,” he stated.
He also disclosed that the reason for which the contract was paid for was simply to ensure that it was completed and
commissioned by former President Buhari before he left office.
“The reason for that payment was for the project to be implemented and commissioned before the exit of the former president. It was not for variation. The accounting officer sourced money from every relevant route to actualize the project. The N800million is a budgetary allowance to support the actualization of the project,” he said.
Odiniyan, a retired director in the Procurement Department, Ministry of Aviation also informed the court that two of the ministry’s contracts awarded to Alburak and Enginos on the Apron and Terminal Building of Katsina Airport respectively, were captured under two different budget codes but appeared in a single code in the
Procurement Department.
The judge adjourned the matter till March 10, 2025 for continuation of the cross-examination.
