The trial of the former governor of Ekiti State, Ayodele Fayose was on Friday stalled after a major witness scheduled to testify for the Economic and Financial crimes Commission, EFCC was absent in court.
The former governor of Ekiti State, Ayo Fayose, and a firm, Spotless Investment Limited, were first arraigned before Justice Mojisola Olatoregun (now retired) on October 22, 2018, for alleged criminal breach of trust, theft, and money laundering to the tune of N2.2billion .
He was re-arraigned before Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke on July 2, 2019, after the case was withdrawn from Justice Olatoregun at the instance of the EFCC
At the resumed hearing on Friday at the federal high court in Lagos, Counsel to EFCC, Rotimi Jacobs explained that the witness was not present in court because he has contracted Coronavirus and that he only became aware of the development yesterday.
READ ALSO: Alleged N2.2b Fraud: EFCC Calls 7th Witness Against Fayose
“The last session, I assured the court that my witness will be coming into Nigeria from abroad. The witness is in Nigeria. He contracted COVID-19.
“I have been monitoring the progress of his health. He is the main witness in this matter. I only became aware of his status yesterday, but he is unable to make it to court as I was informed that he is still very frail.
“The other witnesses whom I have contacted to come are unavailable. I have only one in court today. I intend to call four more witnesses,” the EFCC counsel said.
He added that the only available witness for him was secured on Thursday and they were only able to file her processes this morning.
The EFCC counsel maintained that he did not know it would take so long for the main witness to recover from COVID-19.
READ ALSO: “I Will Be At The EFCC Office Today With My BedClothes, Pillowcase”- Fayose
Counsel to Fayose, Ola Olanipekun (SAN) confirmed receipt of the additional proof of evidence filed on Friday morning for the witness who was available in court but requested time to go through the documents and prepare for the witness.
He said, “In the circumstance of the learned prosecutor, this document ought to have gotten to us some days before this trial, which would have facilitated our preparation to take this witness. Considering the fact that we have just been served this morning, we cannot take any witness for granted. We need to converse with the first defendant to properly prepare to take this witness. In the circumstances, we are not ready.”
Counsel to the second defendant (Spotless Investments Limited), Olalekan Ojo (SAN), aligned with this submission.
He said, “There is no correlation between not being able to produce that main witness and this additional proof of evidence filed in respect of an entirely new witness.
“In the circumstances, the defendants cannot be reasonably expected to be served with additional proof of evidence around 8.56 am and be expected to start with any proceedings. Our inability to continue was foisted on the defence by the prosecution.
“On the last note, I concede that the statement of the witness is only a six-page document but it has to be read from the context of the entire case. We ought to hear from the defendants as they are masters of the facts. Thus, time is needed to interface with the defendants so they can provide necessary facts to guide us in the conduct of their defence.”
The trial Judge, Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke has adjourned the proceedings to Jan 28 and 29 for the continuation of the trial.
